Author: News Desk

  • Rajab Butt named as accomplice in rape FIR against Salman Haider

    Rajab Butt named as accomplice in rape FIR against Salman Haider

    An First Information Report (FIR) has been filed against YouTuber Rajab Butt and his cousin Salman Haider. Haider faces accusations of rape, blackmail, and unlawful confinement, while Butt is alleged to have been an accomplice in locking the complainant and her sister.

    According to the FIR lodged at Nawab Town Police Station by social media activist Ayesha Sharafat, the complainant became friends with Salman Haider through social media. They met frequently in public until an incident on August 16, 2024, when she alleges Salman invited her to his house in Bahria Orchard.

    “Salman called me at 7 PM on August 16, 2024, and invited me to his house in Bahria Orchard. Due to trust, I agreed,” she stated in the FIR.

    She further alleged that upon her arrival, Salman offered her a drink.

    “He gave me juice that had been mixed with an intoxicating substance. After consuming it, I lost consciousness. When I regained awareness, I realized I had been raped; my shirt buttons were open,” she said.

    “Fearing social stigma, I remained silent and did not inform my family,” she stated.

    “Later, Salman contacted me again. When I refused to meet him, he began blackmailing me using an explicit video he had secretly filmed without my consent.”

    “He also sent that video to my sister, Palwasha, which prompted both of us to confront him at his residence,” she added.

    “We went to Salman’s house to stop him, but once there, Rajab Butt, Man Dogar, Jawad Haider, and Jahangir Butt, who were present with Salman, locked us in a room,” she alleged. “Jawad Haider snatched our mobile phones, reset them, and then threatened us before throwing us out.”

    Earlier, in May, a video allegedly showing YouTuber Rajab Butt and his associates assaulting a young man went viral on social media. Following the incident, the victim filed a request for legal action at the Satu Katla Police Station. However, YouTuber Rajab Butt later issued an apology and termed the incident a misunderstanding. The victim accepted the apology, and both parties subsequently reconciled, leading to the withdrawal of the request.

  • Netizens fume over Fiza Ali’s ‘sweeper’ statement on Suhail Warraich

    Netizens fume over Fiza Ali’s ‘sweeper’ statement on Suhail Warraich

    Television host Fiza Ali’s remarks about veteran journalist Suhail Warraich, analyst Irshad Bhatti, and other guests have ruffled feathers online.

    During her appearance on an Eid Ul Azha special episode of Kamran Shahid’s show ‘On The Front,’  Fiza was asked to share her thoughts on the guests who were present with her on the show and to guess what professions they might have pursued if they weren’t in their current fields.

    Commenting on analyst Mujeeb Ur Rehman Shami, she said that he would have been a “chef” if he had not been in journalism because he adds spices to his conversation.

    About Irshad Bhatti, she said that he would have been a “tailor” given that Bhatti always wears a tight suit. 

    Apologising to Warraich over what she was about to say, Fiza said that if Warraich had not been a journalist, he would have been “a sweeper at a restaurant in a foreign country,” since he has gone into the washroom of every woman he has interviewed.

    Fiza’s remarks, particularly about Warraich, did not sit well with viewers. One social media user wrote on X (formerly Twitter), “Suhail Warraich is an institution in himself; just because you’re a woman doesn’t mean you can say whatever you want.”

    “Freedom of speech does not mean freedom to insult. It is deeply shocking and unacceptable. How dare someone like Fiza Ali make such demeaning and disgraceful remarks about a senior journalist like Sohail Warraich on a national television channel,” another netizen asked.

    Calling Warraich “a great man” one person said, “You are such a great man Suhail Warraich Sahb…. Fiza Ali made an inappropriate and disgraceful remark, which reflected the filth of her own mind.”

    A day after the clip of the ex-actress’s statement about Warraich went viral, the latter responded with dignity. He took to X, writing, “My status is even below that of toilet cleaners. I am street dirt, as Mian Muhammad Baksh called himself ‘galian da rora kora’.  Cleaning toilets in my view is not [an] insult as cleaning the filth left by others is a noble service.”

    Journalist Umar Cheema commended Warraich’s response to Fiza’s remarks. 

    On Monday, Cheema wrote on X, “Sohail Sahib, this woman [Fiza Ali] made fun of her own mentality. You responded according to your capacity, which is commendable.”

    Cheema opined, “Such incidents often happen in Kamran Shahid’s program. Don’t you think that the person in question cares more about ratings than your respect? If he wanted, he could have edited it.”

    Another social media user called out Kamran Shahid for not protesting Fiza’s  statement. “Kamran Shahid should be ashamed… this lady disrespected a senior journalist and instead of giving him a shut-up call, he is laughing.”

  • ‘Allegations aren’t proof’: Nadia Hussain defends husband amid fraud controversy

    ‘Allegations aren’t proof’: Nadia Hussain defends husband amid fraud controversy

    Actress Nadia Hussain has spoken out about the financial fraud charges her husband Atif Khan is facing. In a recent podcast interview, she addressed the issue candidly, emphasizing that accusations alone do not equate to guilt.

    “There are allegations against my husband that are yet to be proven. He is not guilty,” Nadia stated firmly.

    When asked about her husband’s arrest and the charges against him, she responded, “All around the world, a person is found guilty when allegations are proven. But in our country, people are declared guilty the moment allegations are made.”

    She continued, “Anyone can allege anything. Those claims need to be proven in court. So far, nothing has been proven. It’s the judge and the court who must decide, not the media or social media users.”

    She also revealed that her husband is currently out on bail, but “many complications arose during the process, which delayed the case.”

    Denying any involvement in the alleged fraud, she said, “This is a matter of investigation. If there is a proper inquiry, God willing, justice will be served.”

    Reflecting on the personal toll of the controversy, she added, “During this difficult time, I’ve seen the true faces of some people. They’re not friends or family, just professional acquaintances.”

    Despite the challenges, Nadia expressed full faith in the legal system: “I trust the courts. And I believe many names will come to light as the case unfolds.”

    Earlier, The Additional District and Sessions Judge (South) has reserved the verdict on the bail plea of Atif Khan, husband of actress Nadia Hussain, in a high-profile Rs530 million bank fraud case.

    The verdict is expected to be announced on May 22.

    Police allege that Atif Khan misused Rs530 million belonging to the Chief Executive Officer of a private company for personal business purposes.

    Earlier, 

    Renowned actress and model Nadia Hussain told the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) that she had no knowledge of any fraud involving her husband, Atif Khan, who is currently in FIA custody.

    According to ARY News, Nadia gave her statement during a two-hour session with the FIA. She said her husband gave her money to start and expand her salon and spa business, but she never questioned where the money came from.

    “I was never part of any fraud,” Nadia said.

    She explained that her business is registered with the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), and the money received from her husband was shown as a loan in her tax returns.

    The FIA questioned Nadia about money transfers between her husband’s accounts and those of her salon. Investigators believe she received Rs26.4 million from her husband’s accounts, which was used to run her two salons. These transfers reportedly occurred 19 times since 2019.

    The FIA claims Atif Khan misused Rs540 million from the company he worked for, causing a total loss of Rs1.2 billion. He allegedly passed off business losses to the bank and used over Rs110 million for personal expenses.

    Nadia’s statement has been added to the case file, and she has been named a major beneficiary in the investigation.

  • ‘Name one’; Faysal Quraishi  shuts down criticism over repetitive dramas

    ‘Name one’; Faysal Quraishi shuts down criticism over repetitive dramas

    Actor Faysal Quraishi recently appeared on Hasna Mana Hai alongside Sonya Hussyn and Samina Peerzada, where he did not hold back when an audience member remarked that Pakistani dramas and films are repetitive.

    A young woman from the audience asked Quraishi whether his new film Deemak was any different, given that “all plays and films seem the same.”

    In response, Quraishi challenged the claim head-on: “Name a few dramas that are based on the same story,” he asked.

    The woman could not name any specific titles but insisted that most dramas revolve around conflicts between mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law. To this, he replied, “For the last three years, we haven’t made dramas based on saas-bahu stories.”

    He continued, “This idea that all dramas are the same is simply wrong. Every drama is different.” He cited examples such as Ishq Murshid, Dunyapur, Kabuli Pulao, and his current show, Bahrupiya, as evidence of the industry’s diversity.

    Quraishi also defended Pakistani cinema, saying, “All films are different too. Humayun Saeed’s films are different, Fahad Mustafa’s films are different, and my new film Deemak is different.” He referenced older hits like Jawaani Phir Nahi Aani and Punjab Nahi Jaungi, emphasising that none of them follow the same formula.

    His defence sparked a debate online, with many viewers applauding his stance.

  • Here’s what Pak army did when an Indian woman crossed LoC for marriage

    Here’s what Pak army did when an Indian woman crossed LoC for marriage

    In the Eid Special episode of Tabish Hashmi’s show Hasna Mana Hai, Captain Ali recalled an incident in which a woman crossed the Line of Control (LoC) from Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK) to get married in Pakistan.

    The episode, which aired on Sunday, featured Lieutenant Colonel Ali, Major Asfandyar, Captain Sher Jang, Captain Ali, and Subedar Nazakat as guests, with several soldiers present in the audience.

    “A woman who had contacts in Pakistan crossed the LoC into the country,” Captain Ali recounted, adding that she feared punitive action; however, the Pakistan Army treated her like a “sister”, and senior officers regarded her as a “daughter”.

    He added that the Army helped arrange her marriage as per her wishes. “She is now living happily with her husband in Pakistan,” he said.

    When host Tabish Hashmi asked whether the woman had crossed the LoC solely to get married, Captain Ali replied, “Yes.”

    The show follows the success of Operation Bunyad-ul-Marsoos against Indian aggression.

  • ‘Doesn’t bother me’; Humayun Saeed on criticism about playing hero

    ‘Doesn’t bother me’; Humayun Saeed on criticism about playing hero

    Actor Humayun Saeed recently appeared on the Gup Shab show with Vasay Chaudhry, alongside fellow actor Mahira Khan, where he addressed the frequent criticism he receives for continuing to play lead roles in films, even after all these years.

    When the host asked, “Do you cast actors in a way that no one can outshine you?” Humayun smiled, stating, “I’ve always cast the best talent, like Fahad Mustafa and Hamza Ali Abbasi. But maybe people still criticise me because I’ve been playing the hero for years, and I’m still doing it.”

    He added, “Let them talk, I honestly don’t mind.”

    An audience member asked, “Why is Ahmed Ali Butt in every one of your films? Is it because you consider him your lucky charm?” Humayun replied, laughing, “Yes,” and added, “Ahmed Ali Butt is the funniest actor in the industry. I work with him because he genuinely cracks me up.”

    Addressing the perception that Pakistani films are mere copies of Bollywood, Humayun clarified, “Most people assume our films are inspired by Bollywood, but that’s not true at all. Their opinion usually changes once they actually watch the film.”

    When asked about his preferred collaborators, he said, “If it’s a comedy, I’d go with Vasay Chaudhry. But if it’s serious, or roony wala, my top choice is Khalil-ur-Rehman Qamar.”

    Humayun Saeed’s latest film, Love Guru, was released a day before Eid-ul-Adha. It’s a romantic comedy in which he stars alongside Mahira Khan. In the movie, he plays a charming lover, and audiences are praising the film for its humour, romance, and the on-screen chemistry between the two stars.

    The movie is directed by Nadeem Baig and was produced on a budget of Rs 25 crore. Several actresses have also made guest appearances in the film.

  • ‘He should be punished if guilty’: Father of Sana Yousaf’s killer breaks silence

    ‘He should be punished if guilty’: Father of Sana Yousaf’s killer breaks silence

    Days after 17-year-old social media influencer Sana Yousaf was shot dead by a 22-year-old stalker, the father of the killer has broken silence, saying that his son should be punished if found guilty.

    As per the details, father of murder suspect Umar Hayat alias Kaka has spoken out for the first time since after his son’s arrest, saying that he could not believe his son did it but if found guilty, he “should be punished as per law”.

    In the interview, the father, Amjad, a retired 16th-grade government officer, denied all allegations against his son, insisting that Umar was not involved in drugs and had no history of inappropriate relationships.

    He described the moment he learned about the murder, saying he only found out through a colleague who showed him the viral video. He admitted that, after seeing the footage, he recognised his son but still struggled to believe he could be responsible. “My heart does not accept that my son could do this,” Amjad said. He, however, made it clear that if his son is found guilty, he should face the full force of the law.

    “If he is the culprit, he must be punished according to the law. I appeal for justice, not just for my son, but for the innocent girl who lost her life,” he said.

    Amjad went on to reveal the toll the tragedy had taken on his family. “This house is eating me alive. I have lost everything,” he said, sharing how he had already lost one son and his wife years ago, and was now living alone, wondering if his only remaining son was a murderer.

    The interview with a private media outlet comes days after his son, Kaka, was arrested for his alleged involvement in the murder of Sana Yousaf, who was shot dead at her home in Islamabad last week.

    According to the police, the 17-year-old had repeatedly rejected Kaka’s advances and proposals, which led to the fatal shooting.

    The suspect was apprehended by the police within 20 hours of the killing and later confessed to the crime.

  • Officer reveals how Indian army waved white flag within 30 minutes of Pakistani response

    Officer reveals how Indian army waved white flag within 30 minutes of Pakistani response

    The Eid special episode of Tabish Hashmi’s show Hasna Mana Hai, which aired on Sunday, featured Pakistan Army soldiers stationed at the Line of Control (LoC) in Rawalakot, where personnel recounted incidents from last month’s Pakistan-India escalation.

    Tabish asked Lieutenant Colonel Ali about the time when the Indian Army raised the white flag in response to the Pakistani Army’s punishing fire. Lt Col Ali replied that the Indian Army raised the flag just half an hour after their post was hit.

    “When we began punishing fire around 5:30 am, then around 6:00 am, a white flag was raised by the enemy from their posts,” he detailed.

    When asked to describe what it meant to raise a white flag at the Line of Control (LOC), Lt. Col. explained that it is a symbol of “peace”, adding that waving a white flag amidst an adversary has other reasons too.

    “One of the reasons for raising the white flag is [to indicate] that a post has been effectively hit by the counterpart, leading to casualties and rendering it ineffective. So, it’s a way to give the flag-raiser a respite and pause the war for a while,” he explained, adding that as a professional army that abides by international laws, the Pakistani Army ceased fire.

    According to Lt. Col. Ali, at 11 am the same day, the Indian Army opened fire again, prompting the Pakistani forces to target their second post as well. “They raised the [white] flag again,” he added.

    Lt. Col. added that the red flag is also used in wars, which means “warning”.

    He then recounted that following the ceasefire on 11 May, soldiers from the enemy post, located approximately 150 metres from the Pakistani position, requested permission to fetch water after having run short following Pakistan’s retaliatory fire that severely damaged their post.

    “We allowed them to get water,” he added.

    The show follows the success of Operation Bunyam um Marsoos against India’s aggression.

    The tension between the two nuclear-armed countries rose following the militant attack in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK) in Pahalgam on April 22, killing 26 people, including a Nepalese national. 

    New Delhi blamed Pakistan for orchestrating the attack, without conducting investigations and offering evidence to date. 

    The tension flared further when the Indian Air Force (IAF), while breaching the sovereignty of Pakistan, launched a missile attack in Bahawalpur, Muridke, and other cities in the Kashmir region on the night of May 6-7. The cowardly act prompted the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) to shoot down multiple fighter jets, including Rafales.

    Following the international humiliation, India opened fire at the LOC, killing innocent civilians.

    The military standoff ended after the US intervened and brokered the ceasefire between New Delhi and Islamabad on May 10.

  • ‘It’s so painful, hurts all my body’: Pep delivers powerful Gaza speech at doctorate acceptance

    ‘It’s so painful, hurts all my body’: Pep delivers powerful Gaza speech at doctorate acceptance

    Manchester City manager Pep Guardiola has delivered a powerful speech during the acceptance of an honorary degree by the University of Manchester for his contributions to the city both on and off the pitch.

    Standing up for Gaza amidst the ongoing bloodshed by occupying Israeli forces, the Manchester City manager said it pains him to see what has been unfolding in the region for the past year or so.

    “It’s so painful what we see in Gaza. It hurts my whole body. And let me be clear, it’s not about ideology. It’s not about whether I’m right, or you’re wrong. Come on… it’s just about the love of life, about the care of your neighbour,” he said while addressing the ceremony at the historic Whitworth Hall.

    “We see innocent four-year-old boys and girls being killed by bombs, thinking it’s not our business… but be careful… the next one will be ours. The next kids will be ours. Sorry, but I see my kids when I wake up every morning since the nightmare started with the infants in Gaza. And I’m so scared. Maybe this image feels far away from where we are living now. And you might ask what we can do,” he added.

    Guardiola also spoke on the importance of standing up for what’s right and not taking the backseat thinking about what might happen if one speaks up. “There is a story I’m reminded of… a forest is on fire. All the animals are terrified and helpless but a small bird keeps flying back and forth… to the sea, carrying drops of water in its little beak. A snake laughs and asks, why, ‘You will never put the fire out’, to which the bird replies, ‘Yes, but I’m just doing my part’.”

    “The bird knows it won’t stop the fire, but it refuses to do nothing. In a world that often tells us we are too small to make a difference, that story reminds me that power is not about the scale. It’s about choice. About showing up, about refusing to be silent, or still when it matters most,” he said.

  • Salim was trying to convince me for many years to get married: Mahira Khan

    Salim was trying to convince me for many years to get married: Mahira Khan

    Superstar Mahira Khan has shared that her husband Salim Karim had been persuading her to get married for several years before the two finally tied the knot.

    Mahira appeared on Nida Yasir’s Eid morning show alongside the cast of the film Love Guru. During the episode, she opened up about her personal life, emotions, and romantic nature.

    “I don’t hide my emotions,” Mahira said. “I’m an expressive woman. I can’t keep anything hidden for long.”

     “I’m a romantic person in real life too, and I don’t delay when it comes to expressing my feelings,” she added.

    In response to a question, she revealed, “Salim had been persuading me for many years to get married,” although she didn’t specify exactly how long.

    Speaking about her husband, she shared, “He’s a shy person. He doesn’t like being in front of the camera, which is why he’s rarely seen with me at programs or events.”

    She recalled one instance during a trip: “Once, when we went to London together, everyone recognized me and kept saying, ‘That’s Mahira Saleem Karim.’ After that, he stopped attending events with me.”

    Mahira smiled as she added, “After our wedding videos went viral, people memorized his face. Now everyone recognizes him easily, but he’s not used to the spotlight.”

    Wishing her husband were more emotionally expressive, she said, “I wish he was romantic, emotional, and quick to express his feelings like I am.”

    She also mentioned that this was her second Eid-ul-Adha after marriage and noted, “There haven’t been many changes in my life after getting married.”

    Mahira Khan married businessman Salim Karim in October 2023. This is her second marriage. She was previously married to Ali Askari in 2007. The couple had a son, Azlan, before parting ways in 2015 after eight years of marriage.